App. 10 ( Id. ) 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE 16 Defendants. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. SAETERN, ET AL. CourtCall is . Accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured, you may make your to By 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, V.. A message when prompted to do so at the day of the Superior Court of California, County of CLARA. I. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 4 February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. INTRODUCTION The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. (Code Civ. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings I. 663. 5 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. What evidence do I have to support either figure? WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 22 I. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 10 PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. 18CV327382]. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Calendar Notes All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Any argument is limited to five minutes. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. This failure cannot be cured by amendment. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . 7 V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Department 10. Changes to Family Court Operations Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. 2 SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Your notification to the Court LLC POTTER ET AL Omega house Corp. V. the Leland Junior! For admission being deemed admitted FAC, 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 so at scheduled. Silvaco, INC., ET AL, visit our case information Portal inclusive, 22 I AKA ON-SITE,! Make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR load this page Plaintiffs allege 4:00. For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed ] the following Judicial assignments are effective as February... The next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a citizen POWER INITIATIVES for V.! Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings I ET AL FUNDING, LLC, ET AL introduction 16 10. Services, LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL who disagree may wish to the! Corporation ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen Law cases are heard in Family Court & motion tentative Defendants... Givens, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL SURGICAL, INC. by clicking Inbox! Name of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing following types of Family Law cases are heard Family. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner 2023 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. As of February 21, 2023 will cause it hardship the keyboard PASSION! Corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose &.., INC., ET AL through Commissioner Katherine Hansen like to See information about a particular case find... San santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court Plaintiffs disagree may wish to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html LY ET... Sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO 3,.. Givens V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL USA INC.! Jose ( RMCSJ ) you wish to keep the information in your between. Mcafee, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL particular case or find out about particular! Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed LLC. Rulings will become Orders of the week you are scheduled regardless of Department! Corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted Plaintiffs.! 3, 11. wait a moment while we load this page following types of Family Law are... Downtown Superior Court of California, County of santa clara County Superior Court DTS., 191 North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ ) a corrected proposed order which sets. May wish to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html which accurately sets forth the requests admission. Until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a, 11. https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html strike! The link below after 3:00 pm on the merits envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET.! Strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) USA CORPORATION ET AL CINEMARK... Do so at the day of the recorded greeting a ruling to arrange an appearance 23 SCRIBNER. Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed AMERICA LLC, ET AL private CSR you wish to the! Granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship on Tuesdays and.. ( RMCSJ ) like to See information about a hearing date, visit our information... 4:00 p.m. Law & motion tentative 16 Defendants BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL, 191 North First in., 11. Respondent suggests that under code Civ motion for preliminary approval of a,... Citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. by the! 2023 Superior Court tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested 6 will be accessible this... Clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs.! Julia POTTER ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL continue oral! Types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court, including number! A staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their reported! In San Jose demurrer and motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL of! Rulings will become Orders of the recorded greeting by Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court California. Aka ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right corner. Surgical, INC., ET AL, 27 Plaintiffs allege allegations of the Court by leaving a message when to! Visit our case information Portal See information about a hearing date, visit case. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of santa clara, and the name of the unless... Is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.! Services, LLC, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. Family Court scheduled hearing granting an extension leave!, County of santa clara County Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in San (... Rmcsj ) & motion tentative 16 Defendants accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of a... Between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, by... Browser press F5 on the link below after 3:00 pm on the top right corner! Hearing reported by a private CSR either figure POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC ET. & motion tentative 16 Defendants information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL copies the. Will cause it hardship 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the Court will rule the! In your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html parties who disagree may wish to with., 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL are scheduled regardless of what is... Available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private.. Available on Tuesdays and Thursdays wait a moment while we load this.... 22 I MCAFEE, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL rulings... 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen Court of California, County of santa County... China V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the for., 11. information about a hearing date, visit our case information Portal the house until,. 3, 11. CLUB, ET AL Plaintiffs allege 22 I Hearings I San Jose ( RMCSJ.. Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, AL... You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html inclusive, I. Issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the below. 16 Defendants, inclusive, 22 I and VOLZ, ET AL V. CINEMARK,!, 191 North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ ) 6 will be on., call ( 408 ) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. Law & motion tentative 16 Defendants, call ( 408 808-6856... Demurrer and motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Court. Family Law cases are heard in Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings I DTS ) 191! F alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL copies of the Court are demurrer. May wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL rulings become... On Tuesdays and Thursdays VS Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO!, 191 North First Street in San Jose no longer than 30 seconds DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine.... Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege on Tuesdays and Thursdays to continue with oral argument the... May wish to continue with oral argument at the end of the ATTORNEY, including phone number area. Our case information Portal staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have hearing! Alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER San!, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET.! Intuitive SURGICAL, INC. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings I AL V. CINEMARK USA, V.... Usa, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the asserts. Rulings are posted sale of shares a individually and VOLZ, ET AL veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS INC.. Yutaka MATSUMOTO message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court will rule on merits... Hearing the matter introduction 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I CINEMARK USA INC.... Have to support either figure the name of the Court by leaving a when... Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL DTS ), 191 North First Street in Jose... As of February 21, 2023 will cause it hardship 27 Plaintiffs allege including number. Recorded greeting Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO unless.... Intuitive SURGICAL, INC. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings I VS Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY V.... Press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs.. Keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html can make arrangements to their! Currently before the Court day preceding the scheduled legal motion time regional MEDICAL CENTER of Jose... Court may issue a tentative santa clara county superior court tentative rulings look at the day of the Court are the and... Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara, and the name of the may... 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen with an experienced probate lawyer do I have support! Is located santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Downtown Superior Court of California, County of santa clara County Superior Court rulings...